TY  - BOOK
AU  - Rhee,C.H.van
AU  - Uzelac,Alan
ED  - Maastrichts Europees Instituut voor Transnationaal Rechtswetenschappelijk Onderzoek
TI  - Evidence in contemporary civil procedure: fundamental issues in a comparative perspective 
T2  - Ius Commune Europaeum
SN  - 9781780683386 
U1  - 347.06 
PY  - 2015///]
CY  - Cambridge, United Kingdom, Antwerp [Belgium], Portland [Oregon]
PB  - Intersentia
KW  - EVIDENCIA
KW  - PROCEDIMIENTO CIVIL
KW  - Essays
KW  - lcgft
N1  - Incluye referencias bibliográficas; Evidence in civil procedure : the fundamentals in light of the 21st century; C.H. van Rhee & A. Uzelac --; Evidence and the principle of proportionality : how to get rid of expensive and time-consuming evidence?; A. Uzelac --; Disclosure of documents in civil procedure : the privilege against self-incrimination or a quest for procedural fairness and substantive justice; A. Galič --; Preclusion of late allegations and evidence as a tool to increase the efficiency of civil proceedings in Poland : a short story of the ugly past and the way to a bright future; B. Karolczyk --; The "right to proof" and the "loyalty principle" : a French perspective; E. Jeuland --; Restrictions on the admissibility of evidence; V. Rijavec & T. Kereteš --; Taking leniency documents as evidence in damages actions in cases of competition law infringement; M. Repas --; Lost in translation? : language differences and their impact on evidence-taking in litigation; E. Silvestri --; Evidence, information technology and principles of civil procedure : the Hungarian perspective; V. Harsági --; The potential impact of electronic proceedings on traditional principles of civil procedure : the Slovenian experience; T. Ivanc --; Witness testimony in Dutch civil procedure : facts, figures and statistical relations; F. Hoogers, F. Fernhout, H. Jans, R. Mertens & V. Poels --; Curbing adversarial excesses : an evaluation of the expert evidence regime in Hong Kong after the civil justice reform (with a focused study on personal injury litigation); P.C. Chan & U.-U. Rehman --; The new rules of expert evidence in Macedonian civil procedure : are they a failed effort at reform?; T. Zoroska-Kamilovska --; Evidence : learning from arbitration; P. Oberhammer --; Evidence in civil procedure in the Netherlands : tradition and modernity; C.H. van Rhee --; Taking of evidence in Croatian appellate courts : why no fact-finding at second instance?; S. Aras Kramar --; Evolution of the powers of the judge and powers of the parties regarding the taking of evidence in South Africa; D. van Loggerenberg --; The 1970 Hague evidence convention, the European Union and the 2001 EU evidence regulation : interfaces; J. Valdhans & D. Sehnálek
N2  - "Since the start of the new millennium, many contemporary jurisdictions have been revisiting the fundamental principles of their civil procedures. Even the core areas of the civil process are not left untouched, including the way in which evidence is introduced, collected and presented in court. One generator of the reforms in the field of evidence-taking in recent decades has been slow and inefficient litigation. Both in Europe and globally, reaching a balance between the demands of factual accuracy and the need to adjudicate disputes in a swift, cost-effective and efficient way is still one of the key challenges. The second reason that many countries are reforming their law of evidence is related to cultural and technological changes in modern societies. As the balance between, on the one side, traditional human rights such as the right to privacy and due process is shifting towards, on the other side, the modern need for security, efficiency and quick access to justice, the perception of what is admissible or not in the context of evidence-taking is changing as well."--Back cover
ER  -